Additional Information

Arnhold, A. & A.-J. Kyröläinen. 2017. Modelling the interplay of multiple cues in prosodic focus marking.
Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 8(1): 4, pp. 1–25, DOI:
Arvaniti, A. 2016. Analytical decisions in intonation research and the role of representations: Lessons from
Romani. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 7(2), 6. DOI:
Arvaniti, A. & M. Atkins. 2016. Uptalk in standard Southern British English. Proceedings of Speech
Prosody 8. http://sites.bu.edu/speechprosody2016/proceedings/
Arvaniti, A. & M. Baltazani. 2005. Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora.
In S. Jun (ed), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, pp. 84-117. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Arvaniti, A. & G. Garding. 2007. Dialectal variation in the rising accents of American English. In J. Cole &
J. H. Hualde (eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 9, pp. 547-576. Mouton de Gruyter.
Arvaniti, A. & D. R. Ladd. 2009. Greek wh-questions and the phonology of intonation. Phonology 26: 43-74.
Arvaniti, A., D. R. Ladd & I. Mennen. 1998. Stability of tonal alignment: The case of Greek prenuclear
accents. Journal of Phonetics 26: 3-25.
Arvaniti, A., D. R. Ladd & I. Mennen. 2006. Phonetic effects of focus and “tonal crowding” in intonation:
Evidence from Greek polar questions. Speech Communication 48: 667-696.
Arvaniti, A., M. Żygis & M. Jaskuɬa. 2016. The phonetics and phonology of the Polish calling melodies.
Phonetica 73(3-4): 338-361.
Baltazani, M., S. Gryllia & A. Arvaniti. Submitted. The intonation and pragmatics of Greek wh-questions.
Language and Speech.
Britain, D. 1992. Linguistic changes in intonation: the use of high rising terminals in New Zealand English.
Language Variation and Change 4: 77-104.
Bolinger, D. L. 1986. Intonation and Its Parts: Melody in Spoken English. London: Arnold.
Boudewyn, M. A. 2015. Individual Differences in Language Processing: Electrophysiological Approaches.
Language and Linguistic Compass 9(10): 406-419.
Braun, B. & L. Tagliapietra. 2011. On-line interpretation of intonational meaning in L2. Language and
Cognitive Processes 26(2): 224-235.
Büring, D. 2016. Intonation and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carbary, K., M. Brown, C. Gunlogson, J. M. McDonough, A. Fazlipour, M. K. Tanenhaus. 2015.
Anticipatory deaccenting in language comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(1-2):
Cole, J. & S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. 2016. New methods for prosodic transcription: Capturing variability as a
source of information. Laboratory Phonology 7(1), 8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.29.
Cummins, C., and Rohde, H. 2015. Evoking context with contrastive stress: effects on pragmatic enrichment.
Frontiers in Psychology 6:1779.
Frank, M. C., & N. D. Goodman. 2012. Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science
336(6084): 998.
Franke M. & J. Degen. 2016. Reasoning in reference games: individual- vs. population-level probabilistic
modeling. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0154854. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154854
Goodhue, D., L. Harrison, Y. T. C. Su, M. Wagner. 2015. Toward a bestiary of English intonational tunes.
Poster presentation, 46th Conference of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, Concordia University,
Grice, M. S. Ritter, H. Niemann, T. B. Roettger. 2017. Integrating the discreteness and continuity of
intonational categories. Journal of Phonetics 64: 90–107.
Gryllia, S., M. Baltazani, A. Arvaniti. 2018. Variability and multiplicity of cues in the realization of
intonation. Poster presented at LabPhon16, Lisbon, 19-22 June 2018.
Gubian, M., F. Torreira, L. Boves, L. 2015. Using functional data analysis for investigating multidimensional
dynamic phonetic contrasts. Journal of Phonetics 49: 16-40.
Gussenhoven, C. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.
Gussenhoven, C. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press.
Hellbernd, N. & D. Sammler. 2018. Neural bases of social communicative intentions in speech. Social
Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2018, 604–615. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy034
Hualde, J. I. & P. Prieto. 2016. Towards an International Prosodic Alphabet (IPrA). Laboratory Phonology:
7(1), 5. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.11
This proposal version was submitted by Amalia ARVANITI on 30/08/2018 16:09:01 Brussels Local Time. Issued by the Participant Portal Submission Service.
Arvaniti Part B1 SPRINT
Jun, S.-A. (ed). 2005. Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Jun, S.-A. (ed). 2014. Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Ladd, D. R. 2008. Intonational Phonology (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.
Ladd, D. R. & A. Schepman. 2003. ‘‘Sagging transitions’’ between high pitch accents in English:
Experimental evidence. Journal of Phonetics 31: 81-112.
Lengeris, A. & V. Hazan. 2010. The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination
acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America 128: 3757-3768.
Li, Y., A. Katsika, A. Arvaniti. 2018. Modelling variability and non-local effects in intonation as cue trading.
Poster presented at LabPhon16, Lisbon, 19-22 June 2018.
Peppé, S., J. McCann, F. Gibbon, A. O’Hare, M. Rutherford. 2007. Receptive and expressive prosodic ability
in children with high-functioning autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50: 1015-
Peters, J. 2018. Phonological and semantic aspects of German intonation. Linguistik Online. DOI:
Piccinini, P. & A. Arvaniti. In press. Dominance, mode, and individual variation in bilingual speech
production and perception. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
Pierrehumbert, J. B. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. MIT dissertation. Published
1988, UILC, Bloomington, IN.
Pierrehumbert, J. B. & J. Hirschberg. 1990. The meaning of Intonational contours in the interpretation of
discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. L. Morgan, M. E. Pollack (eds), Intentions in Communication, pp. 271-311.
The MIT Press.
Prieto, P. 2015. Intonational meaning. WIRES Cogn Sci 2015. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1352
Repp, B. H. 1982. Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech
mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin 92: 81-110.
Ritchart, A. & A. Arvaniti 2014. The form and use of uptalk in Southern California English. Proceedings of
Speech Prosody 7, Dublin 20-23/05/2014. http://www.speechprosody2014.org/
Steedman, M. 2014. The surface-compositional semantics of English intonation. Language 90(1): 2-57.
Warren, P. 2016. Uptalk: The Phenomenon of Rising Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Xu, Y. 2005. Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech
Communication 46(3-4): 220-251.
Yu, A. C. L., C. Abrego-Collier, M. Sonderegger. 2013. Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference
perspective: Subjective attitude, personality and “autistic” traits. PLoS ONE 8(9): e74746.